Saturday, March 14, 2015

GLOBAL MARKETS: The perfect market storm: brace yourself for two bull markets to slide at once


Stocks have been soaring, and the bond market has been bullish since 1981. All that could be about to change – but there’s still time to prepare
Are you – and your portfolio – prepared for a perfect market storm? Because there is a risk that a tempest may be on its way, one for which we’re woefully unprepared.
The latest piece of evidence arrived Friday, when the Labor Department announced that in spite of the deep chill that gripped a large part of the country during February, US companies managed to create 295,000 jobs during the month. That figure dwarfed the forecast by economists that employers created only 240,000 jobs while it helped send the US dollar to its highest level in 11 years.
And it’s that movement in the dollar that’s important to watch. The reason behind the greenback’s gains is one of the reasons you might want to ready the same kind of emergency preparedness plan for your portfolio that you have in place for, say, a hurricane or other natural disaster. Because being prepared is half the battle.
The fact is that we’re enjoying what are likely to be the final moments of the “Goldilocks market”. In the years since the financial crisis ended, as interest rates fell, fell again, and went lower still, the value of bonds rose. (It’s pretty logical – investors placed a higher value on the stream of income generated by those bonds, which looked increasingly appealing as rates declined.) That’s been great news for the portion of our portfolios we’ve invested in bond funds. Meanwhile,stocks soared 210.87% from their March 2009 post-crisis lows and the bull market will celebrate its sixth birthday early next week.
It isn’t that the post-crisis rally has been without its bumpy spots, of course. The European Union’s economic woes took their toll on stocks, as did the ongoing gridlock in Washington, as Congress struggled – repeatedly – to reach agreements on budgets and the debt ceiling. Bond markets, too, got the jitters as the US economy began to stabilize and Federal Reserve policymakers began to pull back their support for bonds; investors have felt the pain.
Advertisement
The risk we face now is that both bull markets could stall – more or less simultaneously. And we’re really not prepared for that, either in the way we think about our investments, or in the way we build our portfolios. Over the last 30 years, we’ve treated bonds as a place to take shelter whenever cyclones swept through the stock market; most of the time, that was smart. Global investors are still doing it – that’s one reason the dollar is so high relative to other currencies these days.
The most recent gains in the dollar signal something else, too. That job growth data signals that the economy may actually be stronger than expected, clearing the way for the Fed to begin boosting interest rates for the first time since before the 2008 financial crisis. The dollar? Well, investors want to own assets in the one part of the world where the economy actually seems to be growing, and to do so,they need to own dollars.
And an interest rate increase is bad news for bond investors – as those investors were already discovering last Friday, as Treasury securities reacted with dismay to the jobs data. (Again, it’s logical: as interest rates rise, the stream of income, or yield, that existing bonds generate begins to look relative anemic relative to those new, higher rates.)
Of course, a handful of modest interest rate increases – Federal Reserve Chair Janet Yellen has gone to great pains to demonstrate that policymakers have no intention of putting the economy at risk by sending interest rates soaring – aren’t going to wreak havoc. But they do mark a big paradigm change: the end to the bond bull market that dates all the way back to 1981. And anyone who tells you that he knows what it’s like to invest in bonds during anything other than a secular bull market – and doesn’t look like a contemporary of Warren Buffett – is probably misleading you. Sure, we’ve seen periods in which bond returns have been bumpy; 1994 springs to mind. From time to time, bonds have lost a few percentage points over a month or two – but more often or not, they’ve recouped those losses. That’s a secular bull market at work.
What we’re heading toward is something quite different – much bigger losses, as interest rates go higher and stay there (keeping bond prices, which move in the opposite direction to the yields on bonds, lower). And it’s going to be harder to make up those losses, because the pattern of interest hikes is likely to continue, albeit slowly, over a long period of time. That introduces a whole new set of risksinto the equation.
That would be tricky enough to manage. But ultra-low interest rates have pushed us – just as the Fed intended – out of bonds and into stocks, in search of better investment returns. And we got them, as the economy improved, and corporate earnings boomed. But in the last year or two, stocks also have begun to look very pricey, as the rate of growth in stock prices has outstripped the growth rate in corporate earnings. Now that the median price/earnings ratio for all US listed stocks is now higher than it was either in 2000, before the dotcom crash, or in 2007, before the financial crisis, stock market bears are emerging from hibernation.
The big problem is that there’s a risk that both of these bull markets will end more or less simultaneously, or at least that the endings will overlap. Here’s one possible scenario: interest rate hikes cause investors to dump bond funds and send them into stocks, which in turn drives stock valuations into nosebleed territory. Then a key company turns in disappointing earnings results – and investors panic, triggering a selloff. There are plenty of others.
What happens, when and how is up for debate. What isn’t is that both bear markets are superannuated; both bear markets are vulnerable; there are factors could cause breaks in both bear markets looming on the horizon. That means that there will be selloffs in both. The more you prepare for this now, the less likely you will be to run around like the proverbial headless chicken down the road, when others are. And that’s a good position to be in.
Part of that preparation is simply psychological. It can be scary when it feels as if there is nowhere to shelter – that you can’t simply take refuge from a stock market selloff in bonds any more. But simply panicking and storing the money in cash inside your mattress is probably the worst thing you could possibly do. The best? Plan in advance for how you’ll respond to various market scenarios – talk it through with your adviser, your partner, or your investment club members. Trying to respond to every bit of news in one market selloff, let alone two, is tricky: timing the market, in the absence of a perfectly functioning crystal ball, is a pretty bad idea.
You can also rethink what is in your portfolio. Instead of viewing it as simply a collection of stocks and bonds (so 20th century), view it as a set of investments with different characteristics: some generate income; some exist to provide income and stability; others are riskier but provide more growth. Some advisers have urged their clients to look at new kinds of income-yielding securities in place of bonds. Master limited partnerships, for instance (those that aren’t exposed directly energy prices) offer bond-like returns but aren’t bonds; so, too, are real estate investment trusts. Some investors have turned to ultra-short bond funds as a temporary tactic. Instead of buying a large cap index fund, some pundits recommend looking for stocks that have specific characteristics, or factors, that will enable them to fare better, even in a bear market.
We’re about to enter a brave new investment landscape. There’s still time to get ready.
http://www.theguardian.com/money/us-money-blog/2015/mar/08/bull-market-stocks-bonds

‘Make in India’ or ‘Make for India’?...MODI CHOICES..!!!

‘Make in India’ or ‘Make for India’?

RAGHUNANDAN G
Root of the problem Get to that first sparkstudio/shutterstock.com

When the BJP, led by Narendra Modi, rode to power in unprecedented style, it was largely on the back of the twin promises of development and minimum government. Following government formation, ‘Make in India’ became a catch phrase to capture the imagination of investors and global manufacturers.
This slogan was soon contested by none other than Reserve Bank of India governor, Raghuram Rajan, the man who saw the future when he predicted an imminent meltdown of the global financial system much before the collapse of Lehman Brothers. He questioned the wisdom of the ‘Make in India’ approach and suggested that a ‘Make for India’ could be a better alternative.
My view is that the ‘Make in India’ versus the ‘Make for India’ debate is irrelevant, even incorrect.
It’s a consequence

Both ‘Make in India’ and ‘Make for India’ are outcomes — outcomes that generally bode well for India. When I was in school, my dad never told me I should become a lawyer or a doctor. He ensured that he inculcated the right climate at home so that I could easily figure out for myself what I loved to do; he also gave me the freedom to pursue it. The climate was crucial. The outcome wasn’t. I chose to be neither a lawyer nor a doctor.
Both ‘Make in India’ and ‘Make for India’ need an underlying climate that is crucial for success. Without the right climate, neither will succeed. With the right climate, it does not matter which succeeds. It may actually be a third alternative which is neither ‘Made in India’ nor ‘Made for India’.
Creating the right climate

The number one climate change imperative is moving India up in the ‘ease of doing business’ list, from number 134 (which it is currently) to being in the top 100 within six months and in the top 50 within 12.
This is not easy, therefore insufficient attention is paid to it. Take the telecom spectrum and coal block allocations.
As a fall-out of corruption charges and subsequent investigations, all allocations were cancelled. No one thought about what it would do to businesses that had invested based on these allocations, and the impact it would have on countless people whose lives depended on these businesses.
The government bravely resorted to the ordinance route to address the coal block allocation issue, but that is just not sufficient to put either industry or investors at ease. Cyrus Mistry was vocal in his support for the ‘Make in India’ initiative, but when it came to the Tata Motors-owned JLR setting up a plant, it chose Changshu in China over India.
Therefore, the sooner the government injects confidence through changes in climate, the sooner will such decisions swing in India’s favour. When this happens, it does not matter whether a Tata Motors potentially uses the factory in India to produce cars for the world market or for the Indian market.
Two of the biggest obstacles to the rapid industrialisation of India in the last couple of decades have been land acquisition and environmental clearances.
It will be helpful to see some concrete indications that there is a change of both mindset and will in pushing through the necessary changes.
The basics in place

In the last two decades, India’s growth has taken place despite the lack of public infrastructure such as power and transport. Gaps in public policy were partially filled up by enterprising companies, and by an effective public-private partnership — in the last 30 years India’s PPP market is the world’s biggest. Infrastructure has been the dominant area of PPP. Healthcare and education have also seen moderate success.
In the last five years, the share of private universities has risen. However, after the initial euphoria, there have been some setbacks to the PPP model — overbidding, faulty pricing mechanisms and delayed clearances have led to investor losses.
Financing and the absence of a liquid corporate bond market has also been a problem. But there is hope that these can be overcome.
If power, water and other infrastructure is made available to industry it does not matter whether these inputs are used to make in India or make for India. Let the global marketplace and the entrepreneurs decide on a case-by-case basis.
The average Indian is 17 years younger than the average Japanese and 14 years younger than the average American.
This demographic advantage gave us an edge when the global services industry was growing. India managed to get a lion’s share of the services that the developed world decided to outsource.
Promise of youth

India’s youth bulge is both a promise and a peril. To accommodate the 300 million people who will join India’s workforce between 2010 and 2040, each year India needs to create roughly 10 million jobs and a new city like Bengaluru, along with the commensurate real estate space and investment in infrastructure.
This workforce couldn’t care less if they were employed to make in India or make for India! They just need to be gainfully employed. Without the required labour reforms, industry would rather not take the risk of employing this workforce.
There is hope. Most countries in the world, including China, are rapidly aging while India will continue to remain young and youthful for the next 20 years and more.
An aging world cannot do without a young India.
We need to quickly create a climate in which this youth power is harnessed effectively. I am confident that if there is one government that could make this happen, it is this one.
The writer was the CEO of TaxiForSure
(This article was published on March 13, 2015)
http://www.thehindubusinessline.com/opinion/make-in-india-or-make-for-india/article6991033.ece?homepage=true

STOCK MARKETS-'patient panic' over Fed !!!


Investors in 'patient panic' over Fed language

Sat Mar 14, 2015 6:32am IST
The Nasdaq Marketsite digital monitor wall is seen in New York March 2, 2015. REUTERS/Shannon Stapleton
The Nasdaq Marketsite digital monitor wall is

 seen in New York March 2, 2015.

CREDIT: REUTERS/SHANNON STAPLETON



(Reuters) - Forget the 2013 "taper tantrum."
U.S. stock markets are in the midst of a "'patient' panic" ahead of Wednesday's Federal Reserve statement, when many investors expect a change in the Fed's language that would send the clearest signal yet that a rate hike is coming soon.
The S&P 500 has fallen 2.6 percent since February's stronger-than-expected jobs report a week ago boosted expectations for an interest rate increase as soon as June.
Stocks may fall further if Fed Chair Janet Yellen drops a pledge to be "patient" about rate hikes in the Fed's statement after the upcoming policy meeting. Most economists expect her to erase that word as a precursor to starting rate hikes in June, according to a Reuters Poll.
Fed fund futures contracts, however, show futures traders still expect the first increase in September, putting just 19 percent odds on a June rate hike, compared with a 58 percent probability for September, according to CME Group FedWatch.
With inflation still low, many stock investors are still not ready for a June hike. This may change Wednesday, said Torsten Slok, chief international economist for Deutsche Bank Services in New York.
"Next week if she does remove 'patient' they could get the wake-up call," said Slok, who sees stocks selling off further in what he calls the "patient panic."
Some strategists see the market's decline as a short-lived speed bump because the strength of the U.S. economy that would trigger a rate hike will ultimately help drive stocks up.
Strategists and investors are looking to May 2013, hoping to avoid a repeat of what became known as the 'taper tantrum.' At that time, then-Fed Chair Ben Bernanke sent equity investors running when he talked about conditions that might cause the Fed to reduce its $85 billion-a-month in bond purchases aimed at stimulating the economy.
The S&P fell 5.8 percent between May 21 and June 24 of that year in anticipation of tighter policy, while bond yields rose dramatically. The Fed gradually wound down its bond purchases and stocks rallied to a series of records.
Now, faced with the first Fed interest rate hike since June 2006, equity investors have more to worry about than in 2013 because a rapid rise in the dollar is expected to hurt for many U.S. multinational companies.
On Friday, the dollar .DXY reached its highest point against a basket of major currencies since April 2003, and is on course for its strongest quarterly performance since the fourth quarter of 1992. The dollar's 25 percent move in the last four quarters has historically coincided with a 10 percent drop in earnings per share, according to Bank of America-Merrill Lynch research.
"That's exaggerating the anxiety," said John Praveen, chief investment strategist Prudential International Investments Advisers LLC in Newark, New Jersey.
While Praveen expects U.S. stocks to fall next week in a "patient tantrum" he also sees a comeback and "healthy gains over the next few quarters" due to economic strength.

(Additional reporting by Rodrigo Campos and Ryan Vlastelica; Reporting By Sinead Carew; Editing by Nick Zieminski)
http://in.reuters.com/article/2015/03/14/us-markets-stocks-usa-weekahead-idINKBN0M927620150314

Friday, March 13, 2015

Insurance bill: ADVANTAGES TO RELCAP,MAX, HDFC, SBI & ICICI...!!!

Insurance bill: Who gains more?
Insurance pure plays such as Max India, Reliance Capital stand to gain more even as others could see relatively smaller upticksSheetal Agarwal  |  Mumbai  
 Last Updated at 08:29 IST

Passage of the could lead to about 4-5% rally in banking and financials such as ICICI Bank, and SBI, amongst others. Notably, most of these entities have indicated that they are looking at value unlocking in their insurance business via stake sale and/or Initial Public issue (IPO).

The bill, which will increase the limit of foreign holdings in insurance companies to 49% versus the current 26%, will be a positive for all insurance companies. The actual quantum of stock rally though would be proportional to the insurance segment’s contribution to a company’s overall business. Thus, companies such as (Max), (RCap) and Bajaj FinServ which derive about 40.6% to 81.6% of their sum-of-the-parts (SOTP) valuation from their insurance businesses (Life and General combined), will witness stronger rally as well as higher target price upgrades post passing of this bill.
VALUE UNLOCKING      
FY16 SOTPRs/shareTP% of SotpStake (%)BrokerageDate
HDFC- Life10314008.772ESS7th Jan 2015
HDFC-General19  74  
-life244346.974Angel2nd Feb 2015
ICICI Bank -gen6  74  
Max-Life37350081.672  
Max-Gen35  74ESS28th Jan 2015
Reliance Capital-Life19764840.674ICICISecFeb-15
Reliance Capital-Gen66  100  
Bajaj Finserv-Life626154462.074Sharekhan 
Bajaj Finserv-Gen332  74  
SBI-Life233516.674PL14th Feb 2015
SOTP: Sum of the parts      
Source: Brokerages      
SBI, HDFC and ICICI Bank on the other hand derive just 6.6% to 8.7% of their SOTPs from insurance and hence their stock price gains will be relatively lower, believe analysts.

Suresh Ganapathy, financials analyst, Macquarie Capital, says, “Upsides will roughly depend on the insurance contribution to various businesses. So, ICICI bank and HDFC could see 4-5% upsides. Reliance Capital, Max and Bajaj FinServ could likely offer higher upside potential”. He believes Reliance Capital is the top play in the insurance sector.

Upgrades in target price though will come in gradually. Most analysts will raise the SOTP valuation of insurance business and consequently the target price of these companies only when a deal/is actually announced. The quantum of upgrades will be subject to the valuation of the deal and the premium over analysts’ current estimates. 

Vaibhav Agarwal, vice-president, Angel Broking, says, "Insurance businesses could witness value unlocking and provide 3-5% increase in target price of ICICI Bank and HDFC. Actual impact would be dependent on deal valuations."

Reliance Capital is looking to rope in foreign investors in its general insurance business and is in talks with Nippon – its foreign investor in its life insurance business to raise stake. While Bupa and Axa the foreign partners of Max and Bharti, respectively have announced plans to raise their existing stakes, HDFC Life (a joint venture between HDFC and Standard Life) could come out with an IPO. Analysts believe, ICICI bank could also list its insurance business.

Adds Suresh Ganapathy, “We see a possibility that ICICI bank may list life insurance subsidiary or do a stake sale to its JV partner."

Monday, March 09, 2015

STOCK MARKETS & “WISHFUL THINKING-INVESTORS”

STOCK MARKETS & “WISHFUL THINKING-INVESTORS”

NIFTY LONG-TERM VIEW: VERY BIG RANGE- 10500-6750
TECHNICALLY, NIFTY IS DEFINITELY IN BULLS GRIP SO LONG AS IT TRADES ABOVE 8620 LEVELS AND STAYS ABOVE 8909, HAS THE POTENTIAL TO CROSS 9250, EVEN CAN TOUCH 9480 LEVELS WITHOUT MUCH RESISTANCE FROM BEARS. BUT FROM THERE??. AS OF NOW, THERE IS NO IMMEDIATE THREAT TO THE CURRENT TREND, BUT AS TIME ELAPSED, DISTRIBUTION TAKES PLACE....
BULLS NEVER LIKE THE MARKETS TO FALL, UNLESS FOR A “BEAR TRAP”, SIMILARLY NO INVESTOR APPRECIATES THE FALL, WHILE ON THE OTHER-HAND NEVER QUESTIONS HIMSELF/HERSELF-“WHO WOULD BUY FROM ME FOR A HIGHER PRICE?”.THE STOCK-MARKETS DO CONSIDER THE EMOTIONAL STRENGTH OF BUYING, NORMALLY CALLED AS “IMPROVED SENTIMENT!” WITH A HIGH INFLOW OF LIQUIDITY INTO MARKETS AND WILL MOVE IN LINE WITH THE SAID FORCE. NEVER THE LESS AND ULTIMATELY, THE CORPORATE EARNINGS WILL DECIDE &DICTATE THE FUTURE TREND.
THE STOCK MARKETS LOVE OVER ALL ECONOMIC GROWTH COUPLED WITH CORPORATE EARNINGS. ALL OTHER FACTORS LIKE POLICY DECISIONS AND ANY SUCH OTHER MEASURES ARE INTENDED TO IMPROVE THE ECONOMY, THERE BY CORPORATE EARNINGS. THE MARKETS DO RESPECT A SMALL LAG OR A BIT SLOW UP-TICK IN THE OVER ALL ECONOMIC ACTIVITY, BUT CAN’T IGNORE THE EARNINGS IMPORTANCE IN THE STOCK/MARKET VALUATIONS!!.
THE MARKETS NORMALLY FLUCTUATE SOMETIMES TO HIGH AND SOMETIMES TO LOW, AS THE PUSH & PULL GENERATED BY THE BULLS & BEARS, DUE TO "DEMAND & SUPPLY"SITUATION, DEVELOPS “SWING” IS A VERY NATURAL PHENOMENON IN THE STOCK MARKETS. BUT MOST OF THE TIMES THE ARDENT BULLS OR BEARS TEND TO STICK TO “THE CURRENT TREND” WITH A STRINGENT VIEW/ PERCEPTION, THE EXISTING TREND HOLDS GOOD FOR A LONG RUN, REALLY FOR A LONG PERIOD. WHERE AS BEARS, IN OTHER SENSE, ENCOURAGE BULLS TO RUN THE TURF BLINDLY SO THAT THE HIGHER LEVEL SELLING CAN OFFER MORE PROFITS THAN GIVING A TOUGH FIGHT FOR A SMALL BOUNDARY. LIKEWISE, SIMILAR CONDITIONS PREVAIL WHEN GLOOM&DOOM WIDE SPREAD ACROSS, PESSIMIST VIEWS DOMINATE THE MARKETS, BEARS KEEP BLIND EYE TO GREEN SHOOTS, LATER GET CRUSHED!.
MY YESTERDAY POST: NIFTY STRUGGLING TO STAY ABOVE 8900, NOW ANY FALL BELOW 8760, SERIES OF SUPPORTS AT 8280,THEN 7850-CRUCIAL,ANY FALL LEADS TO 6760-6930 RANGE!!”
NOW, NIFTY IS TRADING AT P/E RATIO IS AT 23.9, PRICE TO BOOK VALUE IS 3.8. THE NORMAL COMFORT LEVELS OF P/E ARE ALWAYS AT 16-19 TIMES THE EARNINGS. LIKE THAT, BSE-SENSEX IS CURRENTLY TRADING AT P/E RATIO IS @ 20.02, PRICE TO BOOK VALUE IS 3.13. THE USUAL AND USEFUL COMFORT LEVELS ARE AT 15-18 TIMES THE EARNINGS!. AT TIMES, WHEN THE PESSIMISTIC SCENARIO EXISTED, SENSEX EVEN TRADED BELOW 12, ALSO. SO MOVING FROM HERE WITH CURRENT EARNINGS AS BACK-DROP, AND WITHOUT SUBSTANTIAL,SUSTAINED GROWTH PROSPECTS IN NEAR FUTURE, DIFFICULT TO SUSTAIN THE CURRENT TREND!. THE FUNDAMENTALS HAS TO SUPPORT THE TREND FROM HERE, NOT MERE STATEMENTS OF FORWARD/PROJECTED EARNINGS!.
SO, IF WE CONSIDER A VERY POSITIVE SCENARIO, THEN NIFTY MAY TOUCH 10470 WITH P/E@28, OR IF WE TAKE A GOOD SCENARIO, THEN NIFTY MAY TOUCH 9720 WITH P/E@26,
LIKE THAT, IF WE TAKE A CORRECTIVE SCENARIO, THEN NIFTY MAY TOUCH 7480 WITH P/E@20, AND IF WE CONSIDER A PESSIMISTIC/BAD GLOBAL/LOCAL SITUATIONS MAY COMPEL, THEN NIFTY MAY TOUCH 6730 WITH P/E@18.
AT CURRENT VALUATIONS, THOSE WHO CAN EFFICIENTLY TRADE, CAN MAKE MONEY ON BOTH THE SIDES/MOVES, JUST SWITCHING THE PARTY AS AND WHEN REQUIRED/DEMANDED. WHERE AS THE RETAIL INVESTORS, WHO HAS LIMITED RESOURCES SHALL NOT GO FOR SHOPPING WITH BORROWED MONEY/HIGHLY LEVERAGED RESOURCES. THE REGULAR SAVINGS CAN BE INVESTED AS THEY CAN AVERAGE IN CASE OF NECESSITY. BUT, THOSE ARE ACTIVELY SELLING THE PROFITABLE STOCKS TO RE-INVEST FOR EXTRA MONEY, THINKING/PRESUMING SUCH MOVE AS A SMART STRATEGY, SHALL RESTRAIN FROM DOING SO. THESE EMOTIONALLY ENTHUSIASTIC “WISHFUL-THINKING-INVESTORS” DO RAPIDLY CHURN THEIR PORTFOLIOS FOR EXTRA PROFITS. THEY DO IT AGAIN AND AGAIN, RE-INVEST IN SOME OTHER UNDER-PERFORMING STOCKS, THINKING WILL FOLLOW THE TREND,LATER!. NORMALLY THESE INVESTORS ARE “YELL ON SUCCESS” OPEN TO SWEET-NEWS BUT BLIND TO FUTURE “HAPPENINGS”, EVENTUALLY, GET TRAPPED!.
IT IS NO BIG SURPRISE TO PSYCHOLOGISTS, ARE SERIOUSLY ANALYZING MARKET BEHAVIORS, STUDY INVESTORS PSYCHOLOGY, MANY A TIMES IN THE PAST PRONOUNCED THEIR RESULTS, THAT MOST RETAIL INVESTORS IN STOCK-MARKETS CLING/GLUE TO A PSYCHOLOGICAL -“ATTACHMENT"TO CURRENT TRENDS!, BELIEVING A PERSISTENT BULL RUN WILL BE MAINTAINED AND TEND TO BELIEVE THEIR PAST EXPERIENCES AND INVESTMENTS SUCCESS WILL BE REPEATED AND WILL CONTINUE!!. THEY ENCOURAGE THEMSELVES TO ARGUE WITH THE DOWN TREND TICKER, EVEN IF THERE IS A SERIOUS FALL. THEY DOUBLE/TRIPLE THEIR BETS, CLAIM THAT MARKETS WILL BOUNCE WITH VIGOR, CONSIDER EACH CORRECTION IS AN OPPORTUNITY TO BUY AND MARKETS WILL RESUME THEIR EARLIER UP-TRENDS. THE WHOLE MARKET VALUATIONS TAKE AN ABRUPT "U" TURN, SURPRISINGLY, CHANGE/ADJUST WHEN ABERRATIONAL PRICE RISE HAPPENS BEYOND NORMAL/REASONABLE VALUATIONS, SPOIL THE WHOLE PARTY. AT THE END, WHO ENJOYS "THE ADVANTAGE OF THE BULL RUN" IS A WELL KNOWN FACT, LIKE- WRITING ON THE WALL!
THE THIRD QUARTER EARNINGS, A BIG DISAPPOINTMENT TO MANY ANALYSTS, NOW IN Q-4, SIMILAR POOR PERFORMANCE WILL BRING BACK TO THE COMFORT LEVELS. SO CAUTION IS ADVISED TO RETAIL INVESTORS WHO GENERALLY CARRY “THE HABIT OF CHASING STOCKS FOR QUICK GAINS”. THE INVESTORS CAN BUY HIGH P/E RATIO COMPANIES, NOT ONLY BECAUSE THEY ARE WORTH BUYING BUT DEFINITELY WILL “STAY IN HIGH-BUSINESS POTENTIAL AREAS”, TEND TOOFFER GOOD LONG-TERM RETURNS. BUT, THESE COUNTERS ARE MOSTLY PREFERRED BY INSTITUTIONS WHO CAN WAIT& AVERAGE OVER A LONG PERIOD THAN USUAL.
NOW, BULLS DOMINATE THE STREETS, INDEX IS REGULARLY CLIMBING AND NEWS HEADLINES COVERING “ALL GOOD FACTORS” ATTRACTING SMALL INVESTORS, WITH LIMITED RESOURCES & INFORMATION, WITH A VIEW ON SHORT-TERM GAINS, JUMP TO INVEST WITH LITTLE UNDERSTANDING OF THE RUN-UP HISTORY OR THE LEFT OVER POTENTIAL TO PERFORM FURTHER, MAY BECOME “PREY”. THE ECONOMY MAY DO WELL, EARNINGS MAY IMPROVE IN FUTURE, BUT CURRENT VALUATIONS IN SOME HIGH P/E COUNTERS MAY NOT BE "AWARDED" AS COMPANY SPECIFIC POSITIVES ALREADY DISCOUNTED, LONG AGO!.
THE RETAIL INVESTORS WHO ARE TEMPTED TO CHASE THESE VOLATILE COUNTERS, FORCED TO BECOME & ACT AS “A WAREHOUSE TO HOARD THE STOCK” FOR HNIs/INSTITUTIONS FOR SOME TIME. UNFORTUNATELY, THESE INVESTORS DECLARE THAT THEY BOUGHT IT FOR LONG-TERM, AS SCRIP CARRIES "HUGE POTENTIAL"!. THIS UN-SOLICITED BUYING AT HIGH PRICE/VALUATIONS, LATER REALIZE THAT THEY"GOT TRAPPED". THE MATH WORKS LIKE THIS, ONE NEEDS TO UNDERSTAND THE BASIC PRINCIPLE OF "CASH-INFLATION-TIME & STOCK VALUE". THESE INVESTORS SUPPLIED/EXCHANGED HARD CASH, RECEIVED UN-MATURED PAPER. MOST OF THE TIMES, THESE INVESTORS HAS TO CARRY THE PAINS FOR EVEN MORE THAN 5-8 YEARS. JUST CALCULATE A SIMPLE BANK INTEREST FOR A FIXED DEPOSIT FOR THAT PERIOD, MAY GET DOUBLE THE MONEY. SO,THE STOCK HAS TO DOUBLE DURING THE HOLDING PERIOD, OTHERWISE A BIG LOSS AND A LOT MORE FRUSTRATIONS TO SUFFER!!!.
THE MAJOR PSYCHOLOGICAL CONSTRAINTS TO RETAIL INVESTORS WHILE REAPING PROFITS IN STOCK MARKETS ARE THE DIE-HARD HABITS LIKE "LURE/TEMPTATIONS" COUPLED WITH LACK OF CLARITY OVER INVESTMENT TIME PERIOD WHETHER IT IS FOR SHORT-TERM/MEDIUM TERM & LONG-TERM. THEY BUY WITH A PURPOSE, MEAN WHILE SOME OTHER STOCK PERFORMS, SO "SELL THIS AND BUY THAT",AFTER A FEW YEARS OF HOLDING!, THEN AGAIN A REVERSE EXCHANGE!. MANY EXPERTS ADVISE CAUTION ON TOO MUCH CHURNING AS THE "RAMPANT CHURN&CHASE STOCKS" CONCEPT YIELD LITTLE POSITIVE RESULTS TO INVESTORS, FINANCIALLY!!.
SO, PLEASE BUY QUALITY NAMES WITH REASONABLE P/E ALONG WITH GOOD POTENTIAL TO OUT-PERFORM IN FUTURE. IF YOU CAN'T FIND OUT ANY SUCH STOCKS, BETTER STAY AWAY!!!

PAST BULL RUN SOME HIGH P/E COMPANIES NOT SUPPORTED BY FUNDAMENTALS,BUSTED!!, NOW EVEN CONCERNED AUTHORITIES NOT ABLE TO TRACE/LOCATE ..........